Hillary Just Lost My Vote

I suppose at this point it's fairly well known that Hillary Clinton was searching for a campaign theme song. Overlooking the obvious questions as to why a political campaign needs a theme song (Bill made a good point with Fleetwood Mac in 1992, since then it's been gratuitous), this has been a fairly entertaining series of events. It got her scads of attention. There was clever marketing around it on the web. Involving the public seemed like a good idea.

Unfortunately, the public are morons.

Today we find that the masses have spoken and have selected Celine Dion's "You and I" as the winner.

Huh?

Okay, putting aside the fact that Celine Dion... how shall I put it... sucks, has anyone outside of Quebec even heard of this song? Probably not, because it's atrocious! At least the release video, a spoof on the Sopranos series finale, was clever and funny (although dear old Bill was wooden as ever in delivering his lines. How can someone who can give good speeches be so horrible at delivering lines?).

But you want to talk about vast, right-wing conspiracies, has anyone checked who was voting for this thing? I mean, look at some of the contenders! The Police's "Every Little Thing She Does," U2's "Beautiful Day," and Lenny Kravitz's "Are You Gonna Go My Way" (Hey Obama, need a campaign song?). How could Celine Dion win out over these? She shouldn't even have been in the finals.

I'm just waiting for the day we have a candidate who, when asked about music, will talk about the Clash and the Cure and then say "Dude, have you heard the new Wilco album?"

Never gonna happen.

Comments

Steve said…
She lost my vote a long time ago (although might win it back if the Obama campaign doesn't stop calling me!), but I have to agree with you on the song. My favorite bit about the song is that it was originally written as a jingle for Air Canada. She'd have been better off pulling a Supreme Court and overriding the contest results. :)
July 2, 2007 at 4:53 PM
Doug said…
Well, I'm an unregistered voter so that means in Massachusetts I can vote in either party's primary, but I have to choose one.

Problem is that I want to vote in both so I can vote against Clinton and vote against Giuliani. If either one gets their party nomination our nation will be one step closer to being royally screwed.

Who would I vote for? Oh I dunno... I suppose Obama for the Jackasses and Ron Paul for the Woolly Mammoths.

I doubt either one of them stands a chance though based on the odds.
August 1, 2007 at 2:20 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barackary Clintama

I've started to hold out some vague hope for the next presidential elections. At least, unlike the last time, it looks like I'll have enough choices to make voting in the Democratic primary worth my while. Last time I was so non-plussed with my choices for Democratic nominee that I voted in the Republican primary just so I could have the pleasure of voting against Dubya twice in the same year (which had the unfortunate side effect of putting me on the Republican mailing list. Although I've often entertained the idea of showing up at some of the party events I get invites to just to blow their minds). Don't get me wrong, I like John Kerry just fine. I just think it's an indication of how badly people wanted to get rid of Bush even in 2004 that Kerry did as well as he did. Speaking as a fellow tall, funny-looking egghead, he just wasn't electable. So at this point it looks like it will be Obama vs. Clinton for the Democratic nomination (although lord knows ...
Read more

Springing Backwards

Image
I hate daylight savings time. I really do. Maybe it's a silly thing to hate, but it has always seemed utterly pointless to me. And now the additional monkeying around we're doing with this already absurd device is making it even more pointless. IT departments all over the country are having to scramble to reprogram all the automatic clock settings on all the computers everywhere. At my own work, after the patches were applied we all had to go into our calendars and manually move all of the appointments from March 11th through April 8th one hour earlier, since the patch advanced all the times that were already in the system. This has got to be costing millions nationwide. And for what? Apparently the goal is to get a jump on the amount of time people are using lights and thereby save energy costs. Putting aside the fact that with a stroke of the pen congress could mandate 45 mpg minimums for vehicles and thereby save a heck of a lot more energy, how much are we really sav...
Read more